You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: content/english/technical-tools/implementation-tool.md
+25-42Lines changed: 25 additions & 42 deletions
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
2
2
type: regular
3
3
title: AI and Algorithms Qualification Toolkit (AI AQT)
4
4
subtitle: >
5
-
AI AQT is a tool for identification and risk classification of AI and other data-driven systems. Complex legal definitions from the AI Act, GDPR, and other frameworks are simplified into understandable questions. The tool is developed open source and can be used for free, locally by your organization.
5
+
AI AQT is a tool supporting identification and risk classification of algorithmic systems. Complex legal definitions from the AI Act, GDPR and other policy frameworks are simplified into understandable questions. The tool is developed open source and can be used for free, locally by your organization.
6
6
image: /images/svg-illustrations/AI research.svg
7
7
quick_navigation:
8
8
title: Content overview
@@ -11,22 +11,22 @@ quick_navigation:
11
11
url: '#intro'
12
12
- title: Tool
13
13
url: '#tool'
14
-
- title: Outcomes tool
14
+
- title: Infographic
15
+
url: '#infographic'
16
+
- title: Outcomes of the tool
15
17
url: '#outcome'
16
18
- title: Source code
17
19
url: '#source-code'
18
20
- title: Documentation
19
21
url: '#documentation'
20
22
- title: Examples and explainers
21
23
url: '#explainers'
22
-
- title: Flowchart Questionnaire 1A
23
-
url: "#flowchart-questionnaire-1A"
24
-
- title: Flowchart Questionnaire 1B
25
-
url: "#flowchart-questionnaire-1B"
24
+
- title: Flowchart Questionnaire 1
25
+
url: "#flowchart-questionnaire-1"
26
26
- title: Flowchart Questionnaire 2
27
27
url: "#flowchart-questionnaire-2"
28
28
promo_bar:
29
-
- content: "**\U0001F44B Do you also want to start using the tool locally? It's easier than you think! Get in [contact ](/en/about/contact) to learn more. .**\n"
29
+
- content: "**\U0001F44B Do you also want to start using AI AQT within your organisation? It's easier than you think! Get in [contact ](/en/about/contact) to learn more. .**\n"
30
30
---
31
31
32
32
{{< promo_bar index="0" >}}
@@ -35,49 +35,42 @@ promo_bar:
35
35
36
36
{{< container_open icon="fa-solid fa-toolbox" title="Introduction - a solution for the AI Act and beyond " id="intro" >}}
37
37
38
-
Ensuring legal compliance when using algorithmic systems requires correct qualification of in-scope systems and risks categories. AI AQT consists of dynamic questionnaires that help with:
38
+
Ensuring legal compliance when using algorithmic systems requires correct qualification of in-scope systems and correct risks categorization. AI AQT consists of dynamic questionnaires that help with:
39
39
40
-
1A – Identification of AI systems and high-impact algorithms;
41
-
42
-
1B – \[BETA] Identification of AI systems and assessment of high-impact algorithms and solely automated decision-making (sADM);
40
+
1 – Identification of AI systems and assessment of high-impact algorithms and solely automated decision-making (sADM);
43
41
44
42
2 – Risk classification of AI systems.
45
43
46
-
The tool is developed [open-source](/technical-tools/implementation-tool/#source-code)in collaboration with the Municipality of Amsterdam and can be used for free within your organization to manage algorithms. All potential outcomes of the questionnaires are shown in the [figure](/technical-tools/implementation-tool/#outcome) below. The flowcharts of both questionnaires can also be found [below](/technical-tools/implementation-tool/#flowchart-questionnaire-1A).
44
+
The tool is developed [open-source](/technical-tools/implementation-tool/#source-code) and can be used for free within your organization for AI governance. All outcomes of the questionnaires are shown in the [figure](/technical-tools/implementation-tool/#outcome) below. The flowcharts of the questionnaires can also be found [below](/technical-tools/implementation-tool/#flowchart-questionnaire-1).
<!-- Why correct qualification of algorithmic systems matters -->
52
+
<!--Infographic: Why correct qualification of algorithmic systems matters -->
55
53
56
-
{{< container_open icon="fa-solid fa-clipboard-check" title="Why correct qualification of algorithmic systems matters" id="kwalificatie-reikwijdte" >}}
54
+
{{< container_open icon="fa-solid fa-clipboard-check" title="Why correct qualification of algorithmic systems matters" id="infographic" >}}
57
55
58
-
Applying legal definitions in practice raises difficult questions: For example: What features distinguish AI from other algoritmic systems? And what criteria determine the risk category of an AI system? Standardized questionnaires can help govern algorithms efficiently. Questionnaires can be shared across the entire organization and can be processed centrally. AI AQT provides a clear and user-friendly approach and serves as a building block for compliance. Identification and risk classification are relevant not only in the context of the AI Act, but also in relation to the GDPR and additional policy instruments, such as the <ahref="https://algoritmes.pleio.nl/attachment/entity/f1a35292-7ea6-4e47-93fa-b3358e9ab2e0"target="_blank">Algorithm Register Guidelines</a> of the Dutch government.
56
+
Applying legal definitions in practice raises difficult questions. For example: What features distinguish AI from other algoritmic systems? And what criteria determine the risk category of an AI system? Standardized questionnaires can help govern algorithms efficiently. Questionnaires can be shared across the entire organization and can be processed centrally. AI AQT provides a clear and user-friendly approach and serves as a building block for compliance. Identification and risk classification are relevant not only in the context of the AI Act, but also in relation to the GDPR and additional policy instruments, such as the <ahref="https://algoritmes.pleio.nl/attachment/entity/f1a35292-7ea6-4e47-93fa-b3358e9ab2e0"target="_blank">Algorithm Register Guidelines</a> of the Dutch government.
59
57
60
-
#### Flow of the AI AQT questionnaires
58
+
#### Infographic – Flow of the AI AQT questionnaires
{{< container_open icon="fas fa-layer-group" title="Outcomes of the tool" id="outcome" >}}
69
67
70
68
The outcomes of the tool are displayed in the figure below. The following categories are distinguished:
71
69
72
-
#### Questionnaire 1A:
70
+
#### Questionnaire 1:
73
71
74
72
- <spanstyle="color:#005AA7">AI systems</span>: Fall inside the scope of the AI Act. Additional control measures are legally required dependent on the risk category. Continue with Questionnaire 2.
75
73
- <spanstyle="color:#005AA7">High-impact algorithms</span>: Fall outside the scope of the AI Act but inside the scope of the Dutch Algorithm Register. Additional control measures are needed.
76
-
77
-
#### Questionnaire 1B \[BETA]:
78
-
79
-
- <spanstyle="color:#005AA7">AI systems</span>: See outcome Questionnaire 1A.
80
-
- <spanstyle="color:#005AA7">High-impact algorithms</span>: See outcome Questionnaire 1A.
81
74
- <spanstyle="color:#005AA7">Solely automated decision-making (sADM)</span>: Fall inside the scope of Article 22 of the GDPR. Additional control measures are needed.
82
75
- <spanstyle="color:#005AA7">Other systems</span>: Fall outside the scopes of the AI Act, Dutch Algorithm Register and Article 22 of the GDPR.
83
76
@@ -96,29 +89,27 @@ The outcomes of the tool are displayed in the figure below. The following catego
The AI and Algorithms Qualification Toolkit (AI AQT) is developed in collaboration with the municipality of Amsterdam. The source code of the tool can be found on <ahref="https://github.com/NGO-Algorithm-Audit/AI-Act-Implementation-Tool"target="_blank">Github</a> and can be (re-)used under the <ahref="https://eupl.eu/1.2/en/"target="_blank">EUPL-1.2 license</a>. Among others, the AI AQT is used by:
92
+
The first version of AI AQT was developed in collaboration with the Municipality of Amsterdam and has since been further developed by Algorithm Audit. The source code of the tool can be found on <ahref="https://github.com/NGO-Algorithm-Audit/AI-Act-Implementation-Tool"target="_blank">Github</a> and can be (re)used under the <ahref="https://eupl.eu/1.2/en/"target="_blank">EUPL-1.2 license</a>. AI AQT is used by the following organisations:
{{< container_open icon="far fa-file" title="Documentation AI AQT questionnaires" id="documentation" >}}
100
+
{{< container_open icon="far fa-file" title="Documentation AI AQT" id="documentation" >}}
108
101
109
-
Considerations and choices made during development of the questionnaires relating to the AI Act, <a href="https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/commission-publishes-guidelines-ai-system-definition-facilitate-first-ai-acts-rules-application" target="_blank">guidelines</a> from the European Commission on the definition of an AI system, Article 22 GDPR and guidelines of the <a href="https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/article29/items/612053" target="_blank">EPDB</a> and <a href="https://www.autoriteitpersoonsgegevens.nl/documenten/advies-geautomatiseerde-besluitvorming" target="_blank">Dutch DPA</a> (AP) and the Dutch <a href="https://algoritmes.pleio.nl/attachment/entity/f1a35292-7ea6-4e47-93fa-b3358e9ab2e0" target="_blank">Algorithm Register Guidelines</a> are described in ‘Implementation of the AI Act – Definition of an AI System’. The policy briefing explains why certain elements from <a href="https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/commission-publishes-guidelines-ai-system-definition-facilitate-first-ai-acts-rules-application" target="_blank">guidelines</a> of the European Commission on the definition of an AI system contradict the legislative text of the AI Act.
102
+
Considerations and choices made during development of the questionnaires relating to the AI Act, <a href="https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/commission-publishes-guidelines-ai-system-definition-facilitate-first-ai-acts-rules-application" target="_blank">guidelines</a> from the European Commission on the definition of an AI system, Article 22 GDPR and guidelines of the <a href="https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/article29/items/612053" target="_blank">EPDB</a> and <a href="https://www.autoriteitpersoonsgegevens.nl/documenten/advies-geautomatiseerde-besluitvorming" target="_blank">Dutch DPA</a> (AP) and the Dutch <a href="https://algoritmes.pleio.nl/attachment/entity/f1a35292-7ea6-4e47-93fa-b3358e9ab2e0" target="_blank">Algorithm Register Guidelines</a> are described in 'AI AQT Documentation'. The policy briefing elaborates why the <a href="https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/commission-publishes-guidelines-ai-system-definition-facilitate-first-ai-acts-rules-application" target="_blank">guidelines</a> of the European Commission blur the interpretation of the AI system definition.
110
103
111
-
Questionnaire 1B (in beta) will be covered soon in the documentation.
112
-
113
-
{{< embed_pdf url="/pdf-files/technical-tools/AI-AQT/20250228 White paper Implementation AI Act - definition.pdf" width_mobile_pdf="12" width_desktop_pdf="6" url2="/pdf-files/technical-tools/AI-AQT/20250228 Policy briefing guidelines EC AI system definition.pdf" >}}
104
+
{{< embed_pdf url="/pdf-files/technical-tools/AI-AQT/20260312 AI AQT documentation.pdf" width_mobile_pdf="12" width_desktop_pdf="6" url2="/pdf-files/technical-tools/AI-AQT/20250228 Policy briefing guidelines EC AI system definition.pdf" >}}
114
105
115
106
{{< container_close >}}
116
107
117
108
<!-- Examples and explainers -->
118
109
119
110
{{< container_open icon="fas fa-chalkboard-teacher" title="Examples and explainers" id="explainers" >}}
120
111
121
-
Using examples, we explain how legal definitions apply to common algorithmic systems.
112
+
Using examples, we explain how the AI system definition and risk categories from the AI Act apply to real-world algorithmic applications.
122
113
123
114
{{< embed_pdf url="/pdf-files/technical-tools/AI-AQT/20250512 AI risk identification Algorithm Audit.pdf" width_mobile_pdf="12" width_desktop_pdf="6" url2="/pdf-files/technical-tools/AI-AQT/20241216_10_examples_(non)_AI_system.pdf" title="Risk classification" title2="10 examples of (non) AI systems" >}}
124
115
@@ -128,21 +119,13 @@ Using examples, we explain how legal definitions apply to common algorithmic sys
128
119
129
120
{{< container_close >}}
130
121
131
-
<!-- Flowchart Questionnaire 1A -->
132
-
133
-
{{< container_open icon="fas fa-arrows-alt" title="Flowchart Questionnaire 1A - Identification of AI systems and high-impact algorithms" id="flowchart-questionnaire-1A" >}}
The above flowcharts for Questionnaire 1B are simplified representations of only the logic needed to assess whether a system falls under one of the legal definitions, considered in isolation (either AI, high-impact algorithm or sADM). In an actual run through the questionnaire, the questions overlap, and users encounter each of them only once. A complete flowchart of Questionnaire 1B with all paths and outcomes can be found <ahref="https://algorithmaudit.eu/pdf-files/technical-tools/AI-AQT/20260115%20Full%20flowchart%20identification%20EN.pdf"target="_blank">here</a>.
128
+
The above flowcharts for Questionnaire 1 are simplified representations of the logic needed to assess whether an algorithmic system falls under one of the legal definitions: AI system, solely automated decision-making or high-impact algorithm). When using the questionnaire, users encounter questions only once. A complete flowchart of Questionnaire 1 with all paths and outcomes can be found <ahref="https://algorithmaudit.eu/pdf-files/technical-tools/AI-AQT/20260203 - Full flowchart identification EN.pdf"target="_blank">here</a>.
0 commit comments