|
| 1 | +(* GlobalHybridExamp1.ec *) |
| 2 | + |
| 3 | +(* We use theories/crypto/GlobalHybrid.ec to relate the probabilities |
| 4 | + of a "real" and an "ideal" game returning true. |
| 5 | + |
| 6 | + The real game initializes a boolean to true, and then loops m - 1 |
| 7 | + times, where at each iteration it has a 1 / 2^n probability of |
| 8 | + setting the boolean to false. Once the loop terminates, it returns |
| 9 | + the boolean. |
| 10 | + |
| 11 | + The ideal game always returns true. *) |
| 12 | + |
| 13 | +require import AllCore Real Distr StdOrder StdBigop GlobalHybrid. |
| 14 | +import RealOrder Bigreal BRA. |
| 15 | + |
| 16 | +op n : {int | 1 <= n} as ge1_n. |
| 17 | + |
| 18 | +type t. (* we want t to have 2 ^ n elements, including def *) |
| 19 | + |
| 20 | +op def : t. |
| 21 | + |
| 22 | +op [lossless] dt : t distr. |
| 23 | + |
| 24 | +axiom mu1_dt (x : t) : mu1 dt x = 1%r / (2 ^ n)%r. |
| 25 | + |
| 26 | +lemma dt_uni : is_uniform dt. |
| 27 | +proof. move => x y _ _; by rewrite !mu1_dt. qed. |
| 28 | + |
| 29 | +lemma dt_fu : is_full dt. |
| 30 | +proof. |
| 31 | +rewrite funi_ll_full. |
| 32 | +move => x y; by rewrite !mu1_dt. |
| 33 | +rewrite dt_ll. |
| 34 | +qed. |
| 35 | + |
| 36 | +op m : {int | 1 <= m} as ge1_m. |
| 37 | + |
| 38 | +module GReal = { |
| 39 | + proc main() : bool = { |
| 40 | + var b <- true; |
| 41 | + var i : int <- 1; |
| 42 | + var x : t; |
| 43 | + while (i < m) { |
| 44 | + x <$ dt; |
| 45 | + if (x = def) { |
| 46 | + b <- false; |
| 47 | + } |
| 48 | + i <- i + 1; |
| 49 | + } |
| 50 | + return b; |
| 51 | + } |
| 52 | +}. |
| 53 | + |
| 54 | +module GIdeal = { |
| 55 | + proc main() : bool = { |
| 56 | + return true; |
| 57 | + } |
| 58 | +}. |
| 59 | + |
| 60 | +(* we want to prove: |
| 61 | + |
| 62 | +lemma GReal_GIdeal &m : |
| 63 | + `|Pr[GReal.main() @ &m : res] - Pr[GIdeal.main() @ &m : res]| <= |
| 64 | + (m - 1)%r * (1%r / (2 ^ n)%r). |
| 65 | +*) |
| 66 | + |
| 67 | +module Hybrid : HYBRID = { |
| 68 | + proc main(i : int) : bool = { |
| 69 | + var b <- true; |
| 70 | + var x : t; |
| 71 | + (* start from i: *) |
| 72 | + while (i < m) { |
| 73 | + x <$ dt; |
| 74 | + if (x = def) { |
| 75 | + b <- false; |
| 76 | + } |
| 77 | + i <- i + 1; |
| 78 | + } |
| 79 | + return b; |
| 80 | + } |
| 81 | +}. |
| 82 | + |
| 83 | +lemma GReal_Hybrid_1 &m : |
| 84 | + Pr[GReal.main() @ &m : res] = Pr[Hybrid.main(1) @ &m : res]. |
| 85 | +proof. |
| 86 | +byequiv => //; proc. |
| 87 | +seq 2 1 : (={b, i} /\ i{1} = 1); first auto. |
| 88 | +sim. |
| 89 | +qed. |
| 90 | + |
| 91 | +lemma Hybrid_m &m : |
| 92 | + Pr[Hybrid.main(m) @ &m : res] = Pr[GIdeal.main() @ &m : res]. |
| 93 | +proof. |
| 94 | +byequiv => //; proc; sp 1 0. |
| 95 | +rcondf{1} 1; auto. |
| 96 | +qed. |
| 97 | + |
| 98 | +(* we use upto bad reasoning *) |
| 99 | + |
| 100 | +module GBad1 = { |
| 101 | + var bad : bool (* bad event *) |
| 102 | + |
| 103 | + proc main(i : int) : bool = { |
| 104 | + var b <- true; |
| 105 | + var x : t; |
| 106 | + bad <- false; |
| 107 | + x <$ dt; |
| 108 | + if (x = def) { |
| 109 | + bad <- true; (* bad event *) |
| 110 | + b <- false; (* assignment to b *) |
| 111 | + } |
| 112 | + i <- i + 1; |
| 113 | + while (i < m) { (* rest as usual *) |
| 114 | + x <$ dt; |
| 115 | + if (x = def) { |
| 116 | + b <- false; |
| 117 | + } |
| 118 | + i <- i + 1; |
| 119 | + } |
| 120 | + return b; |
| 121 | + } |
| 122 | +}. |
| 123 | + |
| 124 | +module GBad2 = { |
| 125 | + var bad : bool |
| 126 | + |
| 127 | + proc main(i : int) : bool = { |
| 128 | + var b <- true; |
| 129 | + var x : t; |
| 130 | + bad <- false; |
| 131 | + x <$ dt; |
| 132 | + if (x = def) { |
| 133 | + bad <- true; (* bad event *) |
| 134 | + (* but no assignment to b *) |
| 135 | + } |
| 136 | + i <- i + 1; |
| 137 | + while (i < m) { (* rest as usual *) |
| 138 | + x <$ dt; |
| 139 | + if (x = def) { |
| 140 | + b <- false; |
| 141 | + } |
| 142 | + i <- i + 1; |
| 143 | + } |
| 144 | + return b; |
| 145 | + } |
| 146 | +}. |
| 147 | + |
| 148 | +lemma Hybrid_step (i' : int) &m : |
| 149 | + 1 <= i' < m => |
| 150 | + `|Pr[Hybrid.main(i') @ &m : res] - Pr[Hybrid.main(i' + 1) @ &m : res]| <= |
| 151 | + 1%r / (2 ^ n)%r. |
| 152 | +proof. |
| 153 | +move => [ge1_i' lt_i'_m]. |
| 154 | +have -> : Pr[Hybrid.main(i') @ &m : res] = Pr[GBad1.main(i') @ &m : res]. |
| 155 | + byequiv => //; proc; sp 1 2. |
| 156 | + rcondt{1} 1; first auto. |
| 157 | + sim. |
| 158 | +have -> : Pr[Hybrid.main(i' + 1) @ &m : res] = Pr[GBad2.main(i') @ &m : res]. |
| 159 | + byequiv => //; proc; sp 1 2. |
| 160 | + seq 0 3 : (={i, b}); first auto. |
| 161 | + sim. |
| 162 | +rewrite (ler_trans Pr[GBad2.main(i') @ &m : GBad2.bad]). |
| 163 | +byequiv |
| 164 | + (_ : |
| 165 | + ={i} ==> GBad1.bad{1} = GBad2.bad{2} /\ (! GBad2.bad{2} => ={res})) : |
| 166 | + GBad1.bad => //. |
| 167 | +proc. |
| 168 | +seq 5 5 : |
| 169 | + (GBad1.bad{1} = GBad2.bad{2} /\ ={i} /\ |
| 170 | + (!GBad2.bad{2} => ={b})); first auto. |
| 171 | +case (GBad1.bad{1}). |
| 172 | +while (={i}); auto. |
| 173 | +while (={i, b}); auto; smt(). |
| 174 | +smt(). |
| 175 | +byphoare => //; proc; sp. |
| 176 | +seq 3 : |
| 177 | + GBad2.bad |
| 178 | + (1%r / (2 ^ n)%r) |
| 179 | + 1%r |
| 180 | + (1%r - (1%r / (2 ^ n)%r)) |
| 181 | + 0%r. |
| 182 | +auto. |
| 183 | +wp; rnd (pred1 def); auto; smt(mu1_dt). |
| 184 | +conseq (_ : _ ==> _ : = 1%r). |
| 185 | +while (true) (m - i) => [z |]. |
| 186 | +auto; smt(dt_ll). |
| 187 | +auto; smt(). |
| 188 | +hoare; while (true); auto. |
| 189 | +trivial. |
| 190 | +qed. |
| 191 | +
|
| 192 | +lemma GReal_GIdeal &m : |
| 193 | + `|Pr[GReal.main() @ &m : res] - Pr[GIdeal.main() @ &m : res]| <= |
| 194 | + (m - 1)%r * (1%r / (2 ^ n)%r). |
| 195 | +proof. |
| 196 | +rewrite (GReal_Hybrid_1 &m) -(Hybrid_m &m). |
| 197 | +rewrite (hybrid_simp _ _ Hybrid) 1:ge1_m => i ge1_i_lt_m. |
| 198 | +by rewrite Hybrid_step. |
| 199 | +qed. |
0 commit comments