Clickwrapping licensing terms for different tiers (and a sponsors-only EULA template) #18702
Unanswered
reeseschultz
asked this question in
Other Feature Feedback, Questions, & Ideas
Replies: 0 comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hey, GitHub. I'm requesting a feature in which users are allowed to attach licensing terms to tiers, and, additionally, clickwrap them into the sponsorship flow.
In my case, I would like to bind a low-cost tier to a EULA with no service guarantees, but, at the same time, bind a high-cost tier to an SLA that complements the aforementioned EULA. I plan on publicly releasing versions of my licensing agreements as GitHub repos, so I can simply link to these from the tier descriptions until there is a better alternative.
Still, the rabbit hole goes deeper when we consider the idea of a EULA template that could be as ubiquitous as MIT, but obviously with more restrictive terms. As I painstakingly created my own sponsors-only EULA (I have not publicly released it yet), I fantasized about selecting GitHub's "Sponsors-Only EULA" and filling out a simple form to complete it. Creating one such template is a huge ask that involves your IP law folks, but I would urge you to seriously consider it, because many maintainers who would excel with GitHub Sponsors may not have the time or resources to create a custom EULA, nor even consider it. Plus, by having a template, sponsors can learn to expect a high degree of ubiquity and consistency among the licensing terms by which they might be bound, rather than finding themselves confused in a wild west of bizarre and likely unenforceable terms.
Adding to that, I'd like to mention that GitHub's Privacy Statement is already licensed under CC0, so that's a good start in this direction.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions