When using GitHub's 'Add a license' feature, why is only the MIT License auto-filled with my information, while others are not? #188600
Replies: 3 comments 1 reply
-
|
💬 Your Product Feedback Has Been Submitted 🎉 Thank you for taking the time to share your insights with us! Your feedback is invaluable as we build a better GitHub experience for all our users. Here's what you can expect moving forward ⏩
Where to look to see what's shipping 👀
What you can do in the meantime 💻
As a member of the GitHub community, your participation is essential. While we can't promise that every suggestion will be implemented, we want to emphasize that your feedback is instrumental in guiding our decisions and priorities. Thank you once again for your contribution to making GitHub even better! We're grateful for your ongoing support and collaboration in shaping the future of our platform. ⭐ |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
This is intended behavior, not a bug. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
GitHub auto-fills the MIT License with my name and year because its template contains placeholders like [year] and [fullname], which GitHub automatically replaces with the repository owner’s details. Most other licenses like GPL, Apache, and BSD .etc, don’t use those placeholders in GitHub’s template, so they are added as plain text, and you have to manually edit to include your information. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Select Topic Area
Product Feedback
Body
I noticed that the MIT License automatically populates the Copyright info, but other licenses leave the placeholders empty. Is this a bug or intended?
just two images to show the case
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions