Skip to content

[16.0][ADD] storage_backend_environment: make server_environment an optional dependency#576

Draft
yankinmax wants to merge 3 commits intoOCA:16.0from
camptocamp:16-dr-storage_backend
Draft

[16.0][ADD] storage_backend_environment: make server_environment an optional dependency#576
yankinmax wants to merge 3 commits intoOCA:16.0from
camptocamp:16-dr-storage_backend

Conversation

@yankinmax
Copy link
Copy Markdown

PR is aimed to remove server_environment dependency from storage_backend in the scope of this issue:

@yankinmax yankinmax force-pushed the 16-dr-storage_backend branch from beb3aa3 to 0cfb599 Compare March 23, 2026 14:54
"development_status": "Production/Stable",
"installable": True,
"depends": ["storage_backend", "server_environment"],
"auto_install": True,
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

same questions than other PRs.

Is it enough to get it automatically installed on environments where image_tag was already instealled and it only gets an update? or do we need a migration script?

@lmignon
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

lmignon commented Mar 24, 2026

@yankinmax The issue is for V19. Here you are on a stable release. Do you plan to still use these storage addons in the future? You've new alternatives with the fs_* addons.

@yankinmax
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

@yankinmax The issue is for V19. Here you are on a stable release. Do you plan to still use these storage addons in the future? You've new alternatives with the fs_* addons.

The idea was to adapt all the modules that have a direct server_environment dependency.
Ping @ivantodorovich @gurneyalex

@yankinmax yankinmax marked this pull request as draft March 25, 2026 12:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants