Conversation
…s.dev autofill audit
bestpractices.dev autofill audit (board comment 7cf7ac75 on RAN-54) flagged two
remaining `Unmet` criteria on the path to 100% on `passing`:
- `release_notes` "No release notes file found"
- `documentation_basics` "No documentation basics file(s) found"
Added (single PR per board direction):
- CHANGELOG.md Keep-a-Changelog 1.1.0 format with [Unreleased] section
capturing RAN-54 OpenSSF baseline + RAN-59 schema rewrite
+ RAN-15 capture-window fix + recent color-bar fixes.
Reserves a `### Security` subsection in every release entry
so future security fixes are called out for downstream
consumers (covers `release_notes_vulns` SHOULD criterion).
- docs/README.md docs/ index pointing to the existing
docs/mockups/preview-redesign.html design mock plus a
table of where each doc surface lives (README, CLAUDE,
SECURITY, engineering-standards runbook, CHANGELOG,
.bestpractices.json). Conventional discoverability path
root README → docs/ → docs/README.md is now satisfied.
Updated:
- .bestpractices.json
release_notes_status N/A -> Met (+ release_notes_url)
release_notes_vulns_status N/A -> Met (Security subsection contract
is in CHANGELOG.md header)
documentation_basics_* justification refreshed to cite docs/README.md
and add documentation_basics_url
Verified locally: json parses (152 top-level keys, 67 _status keys preserved),
headless tests 84/84 pass, PSScriptAnalyzer Error gate 0 findings — no script
changes in this PR.
After merge the bestpractices.dev autofill should flip both criteria to Met,
closing the score audit. Per the board-approval gate codified on the
Bestpractices goal, RAN-54 stays in_review until board posts `@TechLead approved`.
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2 tasks
aksOps
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 26, 2026
…(RAN-64) (#5) Closes the "README links to it" item on RAN-64. PR #4 already added CHANGELOG.md and docs/README.md to satisfy the bestpractices.dev release_notes + documentation_basics autofill criteria; this follow-up makes the new files discoverable from the top-level README so a human reader landing on the repo finds them without spelunking the file tree. Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
6 tasks
aksOps
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 26, 2026
…ersioning evidence (#8) CHANGELOG.md - [Unreleased] → [v0.1.0] - 2026-04-26 with full Added / Changed / Fixed / Security subsections covering PR #1 (RAN-54 baseline + Scorecard hardening), PR #3 (RAN-59 canonical-schema rewrite), PRs #4/#5 (RAN-64 CHANGELOG + docs/ index), PR #6 (5 SUGGESTED criteria flips), PR #7 (CONTRIBUTING.md + conventional-URL retargets). - Fresh empty [Unreleased] section opened at top per Keep-a-Changelog 1.1.0. - Link refs now point at compare/v0.1.0...HEAD and releases/tag/v0.1.0. .bestpractices.json - version_unique_url + release_notes_vulns_url added (both pointing at the v0.1.0 GitHub Release) so the bestpractices.dev autofill bot has a concrete URL to verify alongside _status: Met. - 5 versioning justifications refreshed to cite the concrete v0.1.0 tag instead of forward-looking commitments: version_unique, version_semver, version_tags, release_notes, release_notes_vulns. These are the criteria the autofill bot verifies by checking actual GitHub Releases / git tags exist. Once the v0.1.0 signed tag + GitHub Release land post-merge, autofill should flip release_notes to Met (currently Unmet pending evidence) and the 4 SUGGESTED versioning criteria stay Met with concrete tag-backed URLs. Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Closes the two remaining bestpractices.dev autofill
Unmetcriteria flagged in the score audit on RAN-54 (board comment7cf7ac75):release_notes— "No release notes file found"documentation_basics— "No documentation basics file(s) found"Single PR per board direction. Auto-merge enabled.
Files
New
CHANGELOG.md— Keep-a-Changelog 1.1.0 format with[Unreleased]collecting RAN-54 OpenSSF baseline + RAN-59 schema rewrite + RAN-15 capture-window fix + recent color-bar fixes. Header reserves a### Securitysubsection in every release entry so downstream consumers can decide whether to upgrade — covers therelease_notes_vulnsSHOULD criterion.docs/README.md—docs/index pointing to the existingdocs/mockups/preview-redesign.htmldesign mock plus a table of where each doc surface lives (README, CLAUDE, SECURITY, engineering-standards runbook, CHANGELOG,.bestpractices.json). Conventional discoverability path root README → docs/ → docs/README.md is now satisfied.Modified
.bestpractices.json:release_notes_status:N/A→Met(+release_notes_url)release_notes_vulns_status:N/A→Met(Security-subsection contract codified in CHANGELOG.md header; zero fixes to date is honestly stated)documentation_basics_justificationrefreshed to citedocs/README.md;documentation_basics_urladdedVerified locally
python3 -c 'import json; json.load(open(".bestpractices.json"))'— 152 top-level keys, 67_statuskeys preserved.pwsh -NoProfile -File ./Test-SnipIT.ps1— 84/84 pass (no script changes in this PR).Invoke-ScriptAnalyzer -Path ./SnipIT.ps1 -Severity Error— 0 errors.Post-merge
Meton next scan, closing the audit at 100% onpassing.in_review. I will not transition todoneuntil the board posts@TechLead approved.Test plan
🤖 Generated with Claude Code