meta: add support for alpha prerelease tag#63135
Open
aduh95 wants to merge 2 commits intonodejs:mainfrom
Open
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
Collaborator
|
Review requested:
|
Member
|
So, under this schema, alpha versions would be named |
Contributor
Author
Why? What would be the upside? |
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #63135 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 89.67% 89.70% +0.02%
==========================================
Files 712 712
Lines 221251 221251
Branches 42393 42390 -3
==========================================
+ Hits 198413 198464 +51
+ Misses 14681 14622 -59
- Partials 8157 8165 +8 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Refs: nodejs/Release#1154
There would be more work needed on the tooling (i.e. NCU), but let's see first if we have consensus on the process.