[OCPBUGS#16869]: Add warning message to create an SCC with a high priority that can block upgrades and cause instability #111316
Conversation
openshift-ci
Bot
added
the
size/S
aksjoshi89
force-pushed
the
OCPBUGS-16869-Revised
branch
from
9c2e1d6 to
1f2cede
Compare
| :_mod-docs-content-type: PROCEDURE | ||
| [id="security-context-constraints-creating_{context}"] | ||
| ifndef::openshift-dedicated[] | ||
| = Creating security context constraints |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🤖 [error] AsciiDocDITA.ShortDescription: Assign [role="_abstract"] to a paragraph to use it as in DITA.
skopacz1
left a comment
skopacz1
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
A few things to address and then this should be good to go
| [IMPORTANT] | ||
| ==== | ||
| Creating and modifying your own SCCs are advanced operations that might cause instability to your cluster. If you have questions about using your own SCCs, contact Red{nbsp}Hat Support. For information about contacting Red{nbsp}Hat support, see _Getting support_. | ||
| Creating and modifying your own SCCs are advanced operations that might cause instability to your cluster. If you have questions about using your own SCCs, contact Red Hat Support. For information about contacting Red Hat support, see _Getting support_. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This takes away {nbsp} characters from Red Hat, which is something we are supposed to have per the SSG. I would revert this line back to what it was before
| = Creating security context constraints for CCS clusters | ||
| endif::[] | ||
|
|
||
| [role="_abstract"] |
|
New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed. |
aksjoshi89
force-pushed
the
OCPBUGS-16869-Revised
branch
from
5ee552b to
96038b2
Compare
|
/label merge-review-needed |
openshift-ci
Bot
added
the
merge-review-needed
skopacz1
added
the
merge-review-in-progress
|
@aksjoshi89: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
|
/cherrypick enterprise-4.16 |
|
@skopacz1: new pull request created: #111371 DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
@skopacz1: new pull request created: #111372 DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
@skopacz1: new pull request created: #111373 DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
@skopacz1: new pull request created: #111374 DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
@skopacz1: new pull request created: #111375 DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
@skopacz1: new pull request created: #111376 DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
@skopacz1: new pull request created: #111377 DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
skopacz1
removed
merge-review-in-progress
6 participants
Version(s):
4.16+
Issue:
OCPBUGS-16869
Link to docs preview:
https://111316--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-dedicated/latest/authentication/managing-security-context-constraints.html
https://111316--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/authentication/managing-security-context-constraints.html
https://111316--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-rosa-hcp/latest/authentication/managing-security-context-constraints.html
https://111316--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-rosa/latest/authentication/managing-security-context-constraints.html
QE review:
QE review performed in [OCPBUGS#16869]: Add warning message for creating an SCC with a high priority that can block upgrades and cause instability #110432