-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 43
SDK-392 Add defensive timeout to iOS initialize to prevent promise hang #833
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
sumeruchat
wants to merge
1
commit into
master
Choose a base branch
from
fix/SDK-392-defensive-init-timeout
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+20
−3
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This tells the JS layer initialization succeeded when it actually timed out. With the iOS fix now merged, this timeout should theoretically never fire. But if it does (some other unforeseen hang), masking the failure with true is incorrect.
If the timeout fires, tje initialization did not complete successfully and the app should know.
The point is to unblock the JS promise, bit the result should be accurate.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good callout, but I think
trueis actually the more accurate result here. Here's why:In
IterableAPI.initialize2(IterableAPI.swift:126-129), the SDK is initialized synchronously beforestart()is called:The callback is gated on
implementation.start()→inAppManager.start()→fetcher.fetch()— that's the in-app message sync, not actual SDK initialization. The SDK is fully functional at that point.Jena confirmed this from the debug session: "we did see the SDK respond to lifecycle events (background, foreground) so it was init despite the hang."
If this timeout fires, the most likely scenario is:
Resolving with
falsewould tell the app "Iterable failed to initialize" — which could cause it to skip Iterable functionality entirely, even though the SDK is actually working. That's a worse outcome for the customer.