-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 966
fix: guard AutoInterrupt terminate during interpreter shutdown #2105
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
EliahKagan
merged 2 commits into
gitpython-developers:main
from
lweyrich1:fix-autointerrupt-shutdown-guard
Mar 9, 2026
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,33 @@ | ||
| from git.cmd import Git | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| class _DummyProc: | ||
| """Minimal stand-in for subprocess.Popen used to exercise AutoInterrupt. | ||
|
|
||
| We deliberately raise AttributeError from terminate() to simulate interpreter | ||
| shutdown on Windows where subprocess internals (e.g. subprocess._winapi) may | ||
| already be torn down. | ||
| """ | ||
|
|
||
| stdin = None | ||
| stdout = None | ||
| stderr = None | ||
|
|
||
| def poll(self): | ||
| return None | ||
|
|
||
| def terminate(self): | ||
| raise AttributeError("TerminateProcess") | ||
|
|
||
| def wait(self): # pragma: no cover - should not be reached in this test | ||
| raise AssertionError("wait() should not be called if terminate() fails") | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| def test_autointerrupt_terminate_ignores_attributeerror(): | ||
| ai = Git.AutoInterrupt(_DummyProc(), args=["git", "rev-list"]) | ||
|
|
||
| # Should not raise, even if terminate() triggers AttributeError. | ||
| ai._terminate() | ||
|
|
||
| # Ensure the reference is cleared to avoid repeated attempts. | ||
| assert ai.proc is None |
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Catching AttributeError unconditionally here can mask real runtime failures when
_terminate()is called outside interpreter shutdown (e.g. thekill_after_timeoutpath inhandle_process_output). Consider only suppressing AttributeError during interpreter finalization (e.g.getattr(sys, "is_finalizing", lambda: False)()), and otherwise re-raising so unexpected terminate/wait breakages don’t silently leave processes running. Also, the comment says “silently ignore” but this logs at INFO—either adjust the wording or log level to match intent.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There may be some merit to this concern, but I don't think it needs to block the change here, since
AttributeErrorreally should not arise here in any other way. I'm also not entirely sure that a change along the lines of what the model suggests here would be robust enough to be worth doing. But probably some future change to make this more robust, or do log in more detail when the capability to do so is present, or both, could be worthwhile. (I reiterate that I don't consider this blocking.)