Conversation
🦋 Changeset detectedLatest commit: c1f2169 The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump. This PR includes changesets to release 1 package
Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are. Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR |
commit: |
|
why doesnt the snapshots fail? |
These files are not used (I mean, not in creation) You should probably tune these |
That's confusing, can we not do that. They're not real repos. |
This reverts commit b169029.
This reverts commit 043fadb.
I'm torn on this one. Yes, they are not real repos... But it's kinda nice to be able to start it, tweak it and save the update. |
|
the tests pass, finally!
we can move that discussion to #956 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM
Maybe @manuel3108 you want to check it out as well?
| adapter: adapter() | ||
| }, | ||
| vitePlugin: { | ||
| dynamicCompileOptions: ({ filename }) => ({ runes: !filename.includes('node_modules') }) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I don't think this is 100% correct. Right now this is saying:
"Enable runes-mode across all project files, but explicitly disable it for all files in node_modules, even those using runes".
I think it should be undefined in the node_modules case to go back to the auto-infer mode
| dynamicCompileOptions: ({ filename }) => ({ runes: !filename.includes('node_modules') }) | |
| dynamicCompileOptions: ({ filename }) => ({ runes: filename.includes('node_modules') }) ? undefined : true |
The newest release of sv is causing our CI to fail in Storybook for this exact reason, because we're using runes in @storybook/svelte and all the other packages. When I change the project's config to the above suggestion, it works fine.
closes #944