delete description about special non-reserved keywords that might still require special treatment#21116
Conversation
ti-chi-bot
bot
added
the
missing-translation-status
ti-chi-bot
bot
added
the
size/XS
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.gh.lumenfield.work/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hello @hfxsd, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
Summary of Changes
I, gemini-code-assist, have reviewed this pull request authored by hfxsd. The primary intent appears to be updating the keywords.md documentation file. Based on the changes, the goal is to simplify the explanation of keywords by removing the concept and specific mentions of "special non-reserved keywords" that previously required escaping with backticks. This streamlines the documentation by focusing on the main categories of reserved and non-reserved keywords.
Highlights
- Documentation Update: The pull request focuses on updating the
keywords.mddocumentation file. - Keyword Classification Simplification: The documentation is simplified by removing the description and references to a specific category called "special non-reserved keywords".
Changelog
- keywords.md
- Removed a sentence from the introductory paragraph that described "special non-reserved keywords" and recommended treating them as reserved.
- Removed the phrase mentioning the
(S)marker used for "special non-reserved keywords" from the description of the keyword list table.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
hfxsd
added
translation/from-docs-cn
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request effectively updates keywords.md by removing outdated information about 'special non-reserved keywords'. This change is well-justified by the linked TiDB parser updates (tidb commit c307c0d and parser PR #1322), which is excellent for maintaining technical accuracy and simplifying the concept for users.
The PR description provides excellent context with links to the relevant code changes, which greatly aids the review process. The resulting documentation is now more accurate and easier to understand.
I've added one minor comment on the removed text to highlight how this change aligns with our style guide's emphasis on clarity and technical accuracy. Overall, this is a good cleanup. Thank you for this contribution!
Summary of Findings
- Documentation Accuracy and Simplification: The changes correctly remove outdated information regarding 'special non-reserved keywords' and their
(S)marker. This aligns the documentation with recent TiDB parser updates, enhancing both the accuracy and simplicity of the keyword definitions for users. - Style Guide Adherence: The update improves clarity and technical accuracy, which are key aspects of the documentation style guide.
Merge Readiness
The changes in this pull request are well-justified and improve the accuracy and clarity of the documentation. From a documentation quality perspective, this PR appears ready for merging. As per standard procedure, please ensure any other necessary reviews and approvals are obtained before merging. I am not authorized to approve pull requests.
hfxsd
changed the title
|
@xhebox: adding LGTM is restricted to approvers and reviewers in OWNERS files. DetailsIn response to this: Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
hfxsd
added
lgtm
and removed
contribution
|
/approve |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: hfxsd The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch |
|
In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch |
|
In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch |
Signed-off-by: ti-chi-bot <ti-community-prow-bot@tidb.io>
hfxsd
removed
the
needs-cherry-pick-release-7.5
hfxsd
added
the
needs-cherry-pick-release-7.5
Signed-off-by: ti-chi-bot <ti-community-prow-bot@tidb.io>
|
In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch |
3 participants
First-time contributors' checklist
What is changed, added or deleted? (Required)
Which TiDB version(s) do your changes apply to? (Required)
Tips for choosing the affected version(s):
By default, CHOOSE MASTER ONLY so your changes will be applied to the next TiDB major or minor releases. If your PR involves a product feature behavior change or a compatibility change, CHOOSE THE AFFECTED RELEASE BRANCH(ES) AND MASTER.
For details, see tips for choosing the affected versions.
What is the related PR or file link(s)?
Do your changes match any of the following descriptions?