delete description about special non-reserved keywords that might still require special treatment (#21116)#21120
Conversation
ti-chi-bot
added
lgtm
size/XS
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.gh.lumenfield.work/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hello @ti-chi-bot, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
Summary of Changes
Hello! Gemini here, providing a summary for this pull request. This PR, which appears to be an automated cherry-pick, aims to update the keywords.md documentation file. The core change is the removal of text that describes a category of 'special non-reserved keywords' that previously required special treatment or escaping with backticks. This suggests that the underlying behavior in TiDB regarding keyword handling has been updated, making this specific documentation section obsolete.
Highlights
- Documentation Update: The primary purpose of this PR is to update the documentation related to keywords in TiDB.
- Removal of 'Special Non-Reserved Keywords': The concept and description of 'special non-reserved keywords' that needed special handling have been removed from the documentation, likely reflecting a change in the TiDB parser or keyword handling logic.
Changelog
- keywords.md
- Removed a sentence from the introductory paragraph that mentioned 'special non-reserved keywords that might still require special treatment' (around line 10).
- Removed the description of the
(S)marker for 'Special non-reserved keywords' from the explanation of the keyword list (around line 56).
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request effectively removes outdated information regarding "special non-reserved keywords" from the documentation. The changes enhance clarity and align the documentation with the underlying code changes in the TiDB parser. Well done on this cleanup!
Summary of Findings
- Documentation Clarity and Accuracy: The removal of sentences describing "special non-reserved keywords" and their
(S)marker improves the clarity and accuracy of thekeywords.mddocument. This change makes the documentation simpler and easier to understand, reflecting the updated behavior in TiDB.
Merge Readiness
The changes in this pull request are clear, concise, and accurately reflect the removal of the "special non-reserved keywords" concept. The documentation is improved as a result. Based on this review, the PR appears ready for merging. As per standard procedure, please ensure any other necessary reviews are completed before merging. I am an AI assistant and cannot approve pull requests.
|
/approve |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: hfxsd The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
2 participants
This is an automated cherry-pick of #21116
First-time contributors' checklist
What is changed, added or deleted? (Required)
Which TiDB version(s) do your changes apply to? (Required)
Tips for choosing the affected version(s):
By default, CHOOSE MASTER ONLY so your changes will be applied to the next TiDB major or minor releases. If your PR involves a product feature behavior change or a compatibility change, CHOOSE THE AFFECTED RELEASE BRANCH(ES) AND MASTER.
For details, see tips for choosing the affected versions.
What is the related PR or file link(s)?
Do your changes match any of the following descriptions?